Legal Opinion

Diederichs v. Diederichs

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for án absolute divorce.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

This is an undefended action for an absolute divorce brought by the husband. The testimony is meagre and incomplete. The plaintiff himself was not called as a witness, and there is none of the formal proof usually required of a plaintiff in these actions, beyond the allegations of the verified complaint. One Alfredo H. Giallorenzi swears that he is “ the attorney in fact ” for the plaintiff, and holds a power of attorney from him, and the plaintiff’s present attorney of record in this action, Mr. O. S. Sinsheimer, offers in evidence a cablegram from plaintiff to said Giallorenzi dated July…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stetson v. StetsonNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API