Legal Opinion

Alford v. Shaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1986No. 132PA85PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Chief Justice.

The sole issue on appeal is whether, in North Carolina, the business judgment rule may be applied to a special litigation committee’s decision not to pursue derivative claims based upon charges of fraud and self-dealing by a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation asserted by minority shareholders. The Court of Appeals concluded that the business judgment rule, “traditionally used by our courts as a defense on the merits to allegations of fraud,” could not be invoked as “a procedural device to dispose of derivative litigation,” 72 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Houle v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Boland v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Seraph Garrison, LLC v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Roney v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API