Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1990No. S-2883Published

1DissentCompton, Justice

I agree with part II of the court’s opinion, holding that the trial court did not err by refusing to instruct the jury on strict liability. However, I also believe that the trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on res ipsa loquitur. The court holds, in essence, that the breakage of water mains due to frostjacking “does not ordinarily occur [in Alaska] in the absence of someone’s negligence.” Widmeyer v. Southeast Skyways, Inc., 584 P.2d 1, 11 (Alaska 1978). As the court acknowledges, the applicability of res ipsa loqui-tur, and thus the propriety of an instruction, is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jennings Buick, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Widmyer v. Southeast Skyways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Houston v. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Roberts Realty Corp. v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API