Kruger v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Judge.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered 29 August 1990 wherein the trial court concluded that the defendant had no contractual obligation to satisfy a judgment entered against William Baker (William) in favor of Jeffrey Kruger (plaintiff).
On 23 November 1985, William and Rebecca Grady (Rebecca) were married. At that time, Rebecca owned an automobile which was covered by an insurance policy (Policy) issued by the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). William also owned a car which he purchased in August of 1985, but his car was not listed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Eatman Leasing, Inc. v. Empire Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Rouse v. Williams Realty Bldg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- John S. Clark Co., Inc. v. United Nat'l. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- New NGC, Inc. v. ACE American InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.