Legal Opinion

Cook v. Workers' Compensation Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1986No. 5-1984; CA A33602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner filed a petition for review of our decision, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We allow reconsideration and dismiss the original petition for judicial review as moot.

Petitioner filed what she denominated as a “Petition for Review of an Order Adopting a Rule.” It in effect is a challenge to a rule of the Workers’ Compensation Department pursuant to ORS 183.400(1). We issued a decision that the case was “affirmed without opinion.” 74 Or App 722, 704 P2d 554 (1985).

The rule, OAR 436-69-301, was challenged as not being properly adopted, not within the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. Steinbach v. Oregon State Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API