Legal Opinion

Cook v. Workers' Compensation Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 16, 1987No. WCD 6-1985; CA A38782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this challenge to a rule of the Workers’ Compensation Department brought under ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks review of our decision, which “affirmed” without opinion. Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 85 Or App 219, 736 P2d 230 (1987). We consider the petition for review as one for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. We allow reconsideration and uphold the rule.

A challenge to an administrative rule in this court is an original proceeding, and our determination of the rule’s validity should, generally, be by written opinion. Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Dept., 79 Or App 21, 717 P2d 658, rev…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Troutlodge, Inc. v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Cook v. Workers' Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API