Legal Opinion

People v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 2008PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1259Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the third degree (Penal Law § 160.05). We note at the outset that, contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal is not void as against public policy (see generally People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570, 573-575 [1998]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 7-11 [1989]). The further contention of defendant that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, or intelligent because he did not recite the underlying facts of the crime but simply replied to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. TinsleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. McCarthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. BuskeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. SimcoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. JamisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. HawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API