Legal Opinion
Omegaflex, Inc. v. Parker Hannifin Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 31, 2006No. CIV.A. 02-30022-MAPPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING . PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S SUBSTITUTE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. Nos. 55, 57, & 83)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, OmegaFlex, Inc. (“Omega-Flex”), has filed this two-count action alleging that Defendant, Parker Hannifin Corporation (“Parker”), has infringed its patents on a fitting used to effectuate leak-tight, metal-to-metal seals in flexible gas piping systems. Defendant denies infringement and has filed a counterclaim challenging the validity of Plaintiffs patents.
Plaintiff now moves for summary…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diomed, Inc. v. AngioDynamics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006