Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nelson v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1998No. 88764Published

1Dissent

OPALA, Justice,

with whom SIMMS, J., joins, dissenting in part.

¶ 1 Today the court gives its imprimatur to a local court rule (Administrative Order CV-95-1 [CV-95-1]),1 which requires all parties in every domestic case (divorce, separate maintenance, guardianship, paternity, custody or visitation actions) to complete a seminar entitled “Helping Children Cope with Divorce.” The rule authorizes the trial court to visit sanctions on noncomplying suitors. By its pronouncement the court informs the public that the underpinnings for the rule’s legitimacy are to be found in an after-enacted statute,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Chiles v. CHILDREN A, B, C, D, E, AND FSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API