Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ex Parte Wilson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 17, 1979No. 59775Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClinton, Judge

Phentermine is a rather innocuous stimulant prescribed as an appetite suppressant in treating obesity. Being unable to subscribe to the anomalism of possession of phentermine carrying a misdemeanor penalty one season, going without any penalty whatsoever during another and then being upgraded to a second degree felony offense in the present season — the latter two changes made without direct legislative enactment 1 — I must respectfully dissent to all but the result.

From the time the Legislature of Texas first proscribed possessing “any drug that bears the legend: ‘Caution: federal law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Newsom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Cousins v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ex Parte AshcraftCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Baldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API