People v. Perez
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
I. Introduction
In this interlocutory appeal by the prosecution, we review the trial court's order disqualifying the Office of the District Attorney for the Eighteenth Judicial District.1 The trial court found that the District Attorney's Office received $91,648.19 from the Department of Corrections for the costs of prosecut*667ing the defendant, Alejandro Perez. According to the court, this financial assistance violated section 20-1-302, C.R.S. (2009) because the boards of county commissioners comprising the Eighteenth Judicial District did not approve of the funding.2 The trial court held that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. NietoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Domingo-Gomez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hassler v. Account Brokers of Larimer County, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. LahrColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. ArellanoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- Board of County Commissioners v. City of Black HawkColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. AryeeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.