Legal Opinion
Marland v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 7, 1931No. K-322Published
1Opinion of the Court
53 F.2d 907 (1931)
MARLAND
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. K-322.
Court of Claims.
December 7, 1931.
David A. Richardson, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Samuel W. Hayes and Hayes & Richardson, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Charles B. Rugg, Asst. Atty. Gen. (George H. Foster, Fred K. Dyar, Bradley B. Gilman, and Ottamar Hamele, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.
Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.
GREEN, Judge.
The plaintiff in this case seeks to recover with interest the sum of $1,236,437.17, which was collected from…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.