Commonwealth v. Scalise
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, J.
The defendants were indicted for possession of cocaine and marihuana with intent to distribute and for possession of ephedrine. 2 All indictments arise as a result of the execution of a search warrant by the police at an apartment shared by the defendants. Prior to trial, the defendants moved to suppress all items seized under the warrant. The only issue argued to the motion judge was that entry under the warrant was illegal because the police failed to knock and identify themselves before they entered the defendants’ apartment. 3 The judge allowed the motions to suppress. A single justice of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- State v. ClevelandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. OrtegaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.