Legal Opinion

Chyten v. Lawrence & Howell Investments

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1993No. B047404PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (C. S.), J.

In this action for breach of an employment contract, a jury awarded a verdict of $81,401.70 for the employee, plaintiff and respondent Kenneth Evan Chyten, against defendants and appellants Lawrence & Howell Investments, a partnership, and its partners Arthur G. Lawrence and Lorraine Howell. Appellants appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict following denial of their motion for new trial.

Facts

For many years appellants have operated a real estate investment business. Appellants placed an ad in the Los Angeles Daily Journal for an attorney with real estate and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crews v. Buckman Laboratories International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Farmer Bros. Co. v. Franchise Tax Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Bornemann v. Gamboa CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API