Legal Opinion

Tobinick v. Novella

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 2, 2015No. CASE NO. 9:14-CV-80781 ROSENBERG/BRANNONPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DR. STEVEN NOVELLA M.D.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBIN L. ROSENBERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Dr. Steven Novella M.D.’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 251]. The Court has reviewed the motion, the response [DE 272], the reply [DE. 277], and the attached exhibits., The Court has also reviewed the record and is otherwise frilly advised in the premises. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion [DE 251] is GRANTED. The speech at issue is not actionable under the Lan-ham, Act because it is .not commercial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Laura Skop v. City of Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edge Systems LLC v. AguilaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  2. Proeduca Altus, S.A. v. Technology Trade Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API