Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Cushing v. Ketchum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1918No. 8645PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; R. W. Higgins, Assigned Judge. Action by H. R. Ketchum against the First National Bank of Cushing, Okla. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardx, J.

H. R. Ketchum commenced an action against First National Bank of Cushing to recover a balance due on certain deposits made by him and for damages for wrongfully protesting .two checks which had been drawn by him against his account when sufficient funds were on deposit to pay said checks. The bank answered pleading payment of the deposit and set out in detail the checks paid ■ by it which had been drawn 'by plaintiff ag'ainst bis account, among which was one check for the sum of $80, about which last-mentioned check this controversy hinges. Verdict and judgment were for Ketchum, and the bank…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Knoxville National Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Burrows v. KlunkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Harris v. Bank of Jacksonville & Maxfield & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting AnnuitiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Francen v. Oklahoma Star Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Peart v. SchwenkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Foutch v. Alexandria Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Rice v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API