Legal Opinion
Chapman v. Commerce Bank of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1995No. 67233PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.
Appellants, F.A. Chapman and Carol Chapman, appeal from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis finding that service was proper and reviving a judgment against appellants and in favor of respondent, Commerce Bank of St. Louis (“Bank”). We remand for actions in accordance with our opinion herein.
On July 7, 1981, Bank obtained judgment against appellants jointly and severally in the amount of $137,919.02, plus costs, with interest thereon at the rate of 9% per annum.1 The judgment was revived on July 1, 1991, pursuant to Rule 74.09. Between July…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Machens v. MachensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- King v. CliftonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Roberts v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State ex rel. Plaster v. PinnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Meyer v. RagarMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lovenduski v. McGrainMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- John Solomon v. St. Louis Circuit AttorneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Michael J. Williams, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Kenneth Zellers, in his Official Capacity as Acting Director, Missouri Department of Revenue, Vantage Credit Union, and Nathan R. Best, Individually and as Trustee for the Nathan R. Best Living TrustMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020