Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Silverman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1992No. 36PA92PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The issue presented in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverages provided in an automobile liability insurance policy which listed two automobiles may be aggregated or stacked to compensate a “Class II” insured person for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. The Court of Appeals concluded that a guest who is injured while riding in a motor vehicle driven by the named insured is a “person insured,” and therefore entitled to stack the UIM coverages of both vehicles listed in the named insured’s policy of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Terrell v. Lawyers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Iodice v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Wiggins v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API