Legal Opinion
FloorPro, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 23, 2010No. 09-651CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge:
Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Response and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as each parties’ reply briefs. Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff cannot establish that the Government’s alleged breach of contract occurred within six years of the date that the Complaint was filed. Plaintiff argues that its Complaint was timely filed and, therefore, its Complaint should not be dismissed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- John R. Sand & Gravel Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Floorpro, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- FloorPro, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011