Legal Opinion
State v. Love, 06 Ma 130 (12-21-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 2007No. 06 MA 130PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Terrance Love appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court which sentenced him to a maximum sentence. The issue on appeal is whether the resentencing remedy imposed by the Ohio Supreme Court in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1,2006-Ohio-256 violates the prohibition on ex post facto judicial decisions and the due process clause. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} Due to events occurring in October 1998, appellant was indicted for burglary in violation of R.C. 2911.12(A)(2),…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Schewirey, 07-Ma-174 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008