Legal Opinion

State v. LaBranche

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 31, 1978No. 7853PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from defendant’s conviction for aggravated felonious sexual assault. RSA 632-A:2 (Supp. 1975). All questions of law. arising from the trial were reserved and transferred by Cann, J. The issue presented is whether the trial court should have granted a mistrial after witnesses for the State testified about an untried indictment of attempted aggravated felonious sexual assault then pending against the defendant. We find that this testimony of the State’s witnesses was inadmissible and sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial.

Defendant was indicted for aggravated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  5. State v. RuelkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. State v. EllisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. State v. WoodburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. ShannonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. Martineau v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API