Legal Opinion

Bell v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 2025No. 5:22-cv-00288Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CR-19-15-G ) Case No. CIV-22-288-G JAYLYN MARQUICE BELL, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is Defendant Jaylyn Marquice Bell’s pro se Motion Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. No. 156). The Government has responded (Doc. No. 174), and Defendant has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 181). After careful consideration of the parties’ arguments, the relevant authorities, and the case record, the Court determines that no evidentiary hearing…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API