Legal Opinion
People v. Jorge G.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 2004No. F043272PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, J.
In this case we consider the constitutionality of three gang registration provisions of the Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (the STEP Act), as amended by Proposition 21, an initiative approved by the voters in the March 7, 2000, primary election. First, we address a void-for-vagueness challenge to a provision requiring registration as a gang member by any person convicted of, and any person who has had a petition sustained in juvenile court for, “[a]ny crime that the court finds is gang related at the time of sentencing or disposition.” (Pen. Code § 186.30,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. Van VyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.