Legal Opinion

State v. Griffin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 4, 2005No. 53064-0-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Under RCW 46.20.285(4), the Department of Licensing must revoke the driver’s license of a criminal defendant who uses a motor vehicle in the commission of a felony. But the revocation of a driver’s license *703under this provision does not constitute punishment for constitutional purposes. Accordingly, the trial court’s finding that appellant Vernon Griffin used a motor vehicle in the commission of a felony did not increase the statutory maximum sentence for purposes of Apprendi v. New Jersey1 and Blakely v. Washington.2 Because the trial court’s finding did not violate Griffin’s due process…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. State v. HearnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. B.E.K.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. BEKCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Amunrud v. Board of AppealsWashington Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API