Legal Opinion

Carter v. Mutual Life Insurance

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Questions ReseRved by Ciecuit CoüRT, FiRst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE OOUBT BY

PBEAB, J.

This is an action on a policy of insurance issued by the defendant company upon the life of Ilenri G. McGrew for $5000 payable upon his death, to “Alphonsine McGrew, wife of ITenri G. McGrew * * * if living, if not living to his executors, administrators or assigns.” The company stands ready to pay the money but desires that it be first judicially determined who is entitled to it — whether Alphonsine McGrew or the administrator of the insured. The doubt upon this point is occasioned by the fact that the insured prior to his decease obtained a decree of divorce…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. McKee v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  3. Danforth v. DanforthIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Barney v. BarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  5. Wilson v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. McGrewSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. McGrew v. Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API