Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Feldkamp

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1924PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

Arthur Feldkamp brought an action in the Superior Court of Cincinnati against the Cincinnati Traction Company to recover damage for its negligence.

Plaintiff claimed that he owned a Packard Twin Six automobile, used by him in the operation of his taxi cab business; that it was damaged by the negligence of said company; and that he was entitled to recover the reasonable cost of the repairs and for the loss of its use for six weeks.

There was a mistrial of this case, due to the failure to introduce proper evidence, the introduction *422of erroneous evidence, and the charge of the court.

The only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Weston v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  3. Mayer v. CohnOhio Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. The EmilieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1870
  5. The TransitDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1870

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Elk Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  2. Hanson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. McCormick v. Mirrored Image, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Kunkel v. CohagenNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc. v. W.M. Brode Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API