Legal Opinion

Yelin v. Yelin

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

Shall a physical examination of a party defendant be allowed in this action for the annulment of a marriage? It is quite true, as contended by the defense, that there is no provision in the Civil Practice Act authorizing a physical examination such as is sought here, and the counsel for the plaintiff concurs in this statement but appeals to the inherent equity powers of this court for the relief that he seeks. It must be kept in mind that I am not deciding the vital question of the complaint as to its sufficiency to justify an annulment for this cause. In harmony with the clear tendency of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. McQuigan v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Devanbagh v. DevanbaghNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  4. Sobol v. SobolNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Gore v. GoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kober v. KoberNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. O'Connor v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API