Legal Opinion · Dissent

Graham v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 17, 2002No. 95,318Published

1DissentBoudreau, Justice

¶ 1 The automobile policy in dispute is comprised of, among other things, liability and UM coverages. Winfred Nimrod Graham (Graham) is covered under the liability portion of the policy by an endorsement that expands the policy definition of who is an insured to include employees conducting company business in their own car. Graham is not covered under the express terms of the UM provisions because they do not provide UM coverage to employees injured while driving a car not owned by the employer. (Here, Graham was conducting company business while driving his own car at the time of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Shepard v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API