Cooch v. S & D River Island, LLC
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR., J. (Retired, Specially Assigned).
There is a venerable body of law, of which Wernsing v. General Motors Corp., 298 Md. 406, 470 A.2d 802 (1984), is the avatar, seeking to preserve the advantages of finality and repose in jury verdicts once rendered. There is a counter body of law, of which Jenkins v. State, 375 Md. 284, 825 A.2d 1008 (2003), is the more recent avatar, dedicated to rooting out jury verdicts that are tainted. There is unquestioned merit in both philosophies. At times, however, they meet in tectonic collision.
There is an understandable tendency in those…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Labate v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Amy Labate & Robert Labate, Individually and On Behalf of Minor Daughter, J.L. v. Rutland Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Rutland Regional Medical Center and Santiago Cancio-Bello, M.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015