Legal Opinion

Doremus v. . Auerbach

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment entered March 3, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to" recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendants. The deceased was a mechanical draftsman employed by the Otis Elevator Company.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment entered March 3, 1917, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to" recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendants. The deceased was a mechanical draftsman employed by the Otis Elevator Company. It had a contract with the defendants Auerbach to install elevators in a building under construction. The deceased was sent to these…

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting as to defendants Auerbach: Chase, Hogan and Cardozo, JJ.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Olsen v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. O'NEILL v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Bein v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. Dinkuhn v. Western New York Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API