Legal Opinion
Totero v. World Telegram Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivern, J.
The defendant Ruark, a resident of Spain, moves, pursuant to rule 3211 (subd. [a], par. 8) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules for an order dismissing the complaint, on the ground he is not subject to the jurisdiction of this court and that service of process was insufficient. The plaintiff cross-moves, pursuant to section 3101 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules for an order directing the defendant Ruark to make disclosure.
The action is in defamation, but the claimed source of jurisdiction is the doing of business here, out of which the action arose. Defendant’s column, published in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sangdahl v. LittonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- American Radio Ass'n v. A. S. Abell Co.New York Supreme Court · 1968
- Bekins v. HuishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Modica v. Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Durgom v. DurgomCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.