Durgom v. Durgom
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtXavier C. Riccobono, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss, pursuant to CPLR 3211, upon the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction of both the subject matter and the person of the defendant.
To the extent that the application is based upon the former ground, it is wholly without merit (see Rosenbloom v. Rudd, 31 N. Y. S. 2d 821).
*514The other ground urged for dismissal, however, presents a novel question regarding the application of CPLR 308 (subd. 3) which appears to be one of first impression in this State.
Defendant, though conceding that he maintains an office in New York City for the conduct of his business as a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seligman v. . FriedlanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Iroquois Gas Corp. v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of LampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- In re LampsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Willis v. WillisNew York Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Van Wagenberg v. Van WagenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Kochenthal v. KochenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Kochenthal v. KochenthalNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Guccione v. GuccioneNew York Supreme Court · 1979