Legal Opinion
Farmer v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 25, 1935No. A-8743PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of the crime of accessory after the fact of the crime of assault with intent to kill, and sentenced to one year and a day in the state penitentiary.
The statute under which the prosecution is based is section 1809, O. S. 1931, which reads as follows:
“All persons, who after the commission of any felony, conceal or aid the offender, with knowledge that he has committed a felony, and with intent that he may'avoid or escape from arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment, are accessories.”
At the conclusion of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chenault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- In re Overfield for a Writ of Habeas CorpusNevada Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DutyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- McFarland v. ChildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- People v. López BallesterSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- Pueblo v. López BallesterSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940