Legal Opinion

McClain v. Chem-Lube Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2001No. 43A05-0104-CV-149PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OFP THE CASE

Appellants-Plaintiffs, Jay McClain and Dawn McClain (the McClains), appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Appellees-Defen-dants, Chem-Lube Corporation (Chem-Lube) and Challenge, Inc. (Challenge). Additionally, the McClains appeal the order of the trial court granting Chem-Lube's Motion to Amend Answer.

We reverse and remand.

ISSUES

The MceClains raise five issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

1. Whether the trial court erroneously applied the rebuttable presumption provided under Ind.Code § 34-20-5-1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Natural Gas Odorizing, Inc. v. DownsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Sumpter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Smith v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Jarrell v. Monsanto Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Suyoung Choung v. IemmaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cansler v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Coffman v. PSI Energy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Holt v. Quality Motor Sales, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Schultz v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Johnson v. Avco Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API