Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1989No. 89-19Published

1Opinion of the Court

771 S.W.2d 764 (1989)

299 Ark. 200

Rickey C. REYNOLDS, Appellant,

v.

Cathy L. REYNOLDS, Appellee.

No. 89-19.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 19, 1989.

Callis Childs, Conway, for appellant.

Kenneth G. Fuchs, Conway, for appellee.

HOLT, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, appellant Rickey C. Reynolds contends that the chancellor erred in increasing his child support obligation without proof of a change in circumstances subsequent to the entry of the original order of support. We find no error and affirm.

Rickey Reynolds and appellee Cathy L. Reynolds were divorced on December 2, 1986. The parties entered into a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warren v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Barr v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. McGuire v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Holley v. HolleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Collie v. CollieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API