United States v. David P. True
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
The Hyde Amendment authorizes reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses to a prevailing party in a criminal case if a court finds that the government’s position was “vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith.” Pub.L. No. 105-109, § 617, 111 Stat. 2519 (1997), reprinted in 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, Historical and Statutory Notes (hereinafter “18 U.S.C. § 3006A, Statutory Notes”). 1 Defendant David P. True (“True”) appeals from the denial of his application for attorney’s fees and expenses under the Hyde Amendment, following his acquittal by a jury of price-fixing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- John Berry, Jr. v. Michael SchmittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Anthony P. Perry v. Tryllous Hossler, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Donald HeavrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Dimitar PetlechkovCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.