Legal Opinion

Wigder v. Wigder

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 18, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Child, A. M.

The petitioner, the wife, filed her petition for nullity on the ground that her husband was physically impotent to consummate the marriage. She has sustained the allegations of her petition and a decree will be advised.

*881The solicitor of the petitioner at the close of the hearing claimed that the petitioner was entitled to alimony, notwithstanding the fact that the marriage will be declared by the decree to be void db initio.

The theory upon which alimony is sought is that there is no practical distinction between a divorce a vinculo and an annulment and as sustaining this view cites…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loudon v. LoudonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Steerman v. SnowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  4. G— v. G—New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
  5. Biddle v. BiddleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brennan v. OrbanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Anonymous v. AnonymousSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
  3. duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Minder v. MinderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Sharpe v. SharpeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API