Legal Opinion

Fowler v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On error to the Hudson Quarter Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

The defendants were election officers, and have been convicted of the offence of conspiring to prevent and obstruct the administration of the laws of the state regulating elections.

Sundry exceptions were taken to the course of law pursued at the trial, which will be briefly noticed seriatim.

The first of these contentions was that the jury that had been struck was unconstitutional, inasmuch as the fundamental law, which declares that “the right of a trial by jury shall remain inviolate,” calls for an ordinary jury and not for a…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  3. Heflinger v. HeflingerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  4. Dovi v. DoviWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Mauldin v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API