Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Crawford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 1933No. 4-2944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). It is insisted that the court erred in holding the claims of interveners for liens to be prior claims.

The testimony is virtually undisputed that W. E. Massey and the Merchants’ & Planters’ Bank & Trust Company furnished the tenants to work the lands rented from the interveners in 1930, and that the interveners did not waive their landlord’s liens for rent. That Massey executed a statement in writing, which was delivered to and accepted by the bank, showing the amount of rents due each respective intervener for rent upon his lands for that year, and that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MyarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Judge v. CurtisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. Taylor v. Corning Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Cocke v. ClausenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  5. Home Life Insurance Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API