Home Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is undisputed that this writing specifying the purpose for which the notes were delivered to and received by the bank was duly executed, but appellees insist that other terms were agreed upon at the time of such delivery, not shown in the receipt, authorizing the bank to substitute other paper or notes for the ones specified therein at its own option.
Parol testimony was admitted, over the objection of appellant, to show such fact, and it is insisted that the court erred in allowing parol testimony adduced to contradict, vary or add to the terms of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Darragh Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Second National Bank v. Bank of AlmaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Cleveland-McLeod Lumber Co. v. McLeodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Huckins Hotels v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Lister v. First National Bank of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Home Life Insurance Co. v. WassonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Central States Life Insurance Co. v. BarrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Taylor v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933