Legal Opinion
Hoag v. Dick
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 7, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Richard Dick appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Augusta, Perry, J.) holding that Dick’s premarital agreement with Terry L. Hoag (formerly Terry L. Dick) was invalid and unenforceable. Dick contends that the court erred in failing to apply the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA), 19-A M.R.S.A. §§ 601-611 (1998), and that, in the alternative, the court erred in its interpretation and application of Maine common law regarding premarital agreements. Hoag contends that the UPAA does not apply, that the court did not commit clear error in finding the agreement unenforceable,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Bauer v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Foster v. FosterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Laqualia v. LaqualiaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Sharon Blanchard v. Ronald BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Helge Riemann v. Kristina A. TolandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- Credit Counseling Centers, Inc. v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Estate of MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.