Legal Opinion

Sharon Blanchard v. Ronald Blanchard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 6, 2016No. Docket: Cum-15-504PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶1] Sharon Blanchard appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Portland, Moskomtz, J.) finding that a valid premarital agreement had been executed by the parties before their marriage and entering a judgment of divorce. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2] On June 22, 1986, four days after executing a premarital agreement, Sharon and Ronald Blanchard were married. The parties had two children, both of whom are now adults. Twenty-six years after the marriage, in December 2012, Sharon filed for divorce. Ronald responded, asserting that the parties had entered into a valid premarital…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. E.H. Ashley & Co., Inc. And Willow Associates v. Wells Fargo Alarm Services, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Nadeau v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Bither v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  5. Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zhao v. CIEE, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Neri v. HeiligSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Peter M. Beckerman v. Ricky ConantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Kourembanas v. Intercoast Colls.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
  5. Ernest P. Neri v. Kimberly HeiligSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API