Legal Opinion

Burlington & Missouri Railroad v. Crockett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Pound, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In September, 1883, tbe defendant in error brought an action against the plaintiff in error to recover damages sustained by the death of one Clayborn Crockett. The peti*571tion, when filed, contained two counts, but on the motion of the defendant below the plaintiff was required to elept upon which count she would rely, and thereupon she selected the second. The second count alleges that on the 7th of March, 1882, the plaintiff below “ was duly appointed administratrix of the estate of Clayborn Crockett, deceased, by the probate court within and for the county of Atchison and state of Kansas, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Bothwell's AdministratorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Madden v. Lancaster CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. City of Friend v. BurleighNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Troll v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API