Legal Opinion

Vosevich v. Doro, Ltd.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 1976No. 36546PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this quantum meruit suit to recover the reasonable value of his services in selling and promoting football shoes. Plaintiff sued Doro, Ltd., David R. Mars, Jr., and George P. Meier. The jury found for the plaintiff against all the defendants and assessed his damages at $64,-500. We reverse the judgment and remand the cause for a new trial.

In determining the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence, this court must give the plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable favorable inference which the evidence tends to support. Bremen Bank & Trust Co. v. Bogdan, 498 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. McClureMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. James v. TurilliMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Atcheson v. Braniff International AirwaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. Kubatzky v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. State v. CurrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. International Materials Corp. v. Sun Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Richard B. Curnow, M.D., Inc. v. SloanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. Spain v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Holtgrave v. HoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API