Legal Opinion

Claim of Peck v. Tassell & Fairbanks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Tassell & Fairbanks and another, from a decision and award «of the State Industrial Commission, made on the 22d day of December, 1919, and entered in the office of said Commission on the 2d day of January, 1920.

1Opinion of the Court

Kilby, J.:

The only question involved upon this appeal is whether claimant’s husband at the time of the accident was an independent contractor or an employee of Tassell & Fairbanks,, of Williamson, N. Y., when the accident occurred. The firm of Tassell & Fairbanks was engaged in business as heating *605and plumbing contractors, installing water supply systems, including engines. Lewis Peck was a mechanic, working for whoever employed him; he did much work in the repair of auto engines as well as other engines. Previous to March 13, 1919, he had done considerable work repairing engines for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Litts v. . Risley Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Claim of Prince v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Matter of Abromowitz v. . Hudson View Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Claim of Abromowitz v. Hudson View Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Matter of Liberatore v. . FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Sullivan v. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Nassau Educational Chapter of the Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Great Neck Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API