Matter of Abromowitz v. . Hudson View Construction Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 9, 1919, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant, while removing awnings from an apartment house, known as No. 885 Riverside Drive, New York city, owned by the appellant Hudson View Construction Company, lost his balance and fell from the third floor to the ground, sustaining injuries.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the. Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 9, 1919, affirming an award of the state industrial commission made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant, while removing awnings from an apartment house, known as No. 885 Riverside Drive, New York city, owned by the appellant Hudson View Construction Company, lost his balance and fell from the third floor to the ground, sustaining injuries. Prior to the accident claimant had been employed by one Feinberg. The appellant Hudson View Construction Company had several…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Beach v. . VelzyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Claim of Peck v. Tassell & FairbanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Beach v. VelzyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Claim of Dutcher v. Victoria Paper Mills Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Claim of Sullivan v. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.