Daniels v. Lansdale
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, County of Humboldt. The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Rhodes, J.:
It appears from the cross-complaint that the parties were contesting preemption claimants of the land in controversy; that the plat of the survey was filed with the Register of the proper Land Office, on the 26th day of April, 1856; that the defendant filed his declaratory statement February 20th, 1856; that the plaintiff filed his declaratory statement October 11th, 1858; that after a hearing of the contest before the Register and Receiver of the local Land Office, and before the Commissioner of the General Land Office, and finally before the Secretary of the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Lansdale v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879