Lansdale v. Daniels
Supreme Court of the United States
Ebbob. to the Supreme Court of the State of California. The- facts and the assignment of errors are stated in - the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cliffobd
Pre-emption rights of the kind in controversy are regulated by the act of March 3, 1853 (10 Stat. 244), from which it appears that unsurveyed as well as surveyed lands, not exempted by the same act, are subject to the pre-emption laws, with all the exceptions, conditions, and limitations expressed in such, unless otherwise herein provided. Provision is also made for the appointment of a surveyor-general and of a register and receiver, with the same powers and duties as conferred and prescribed under the prior pre-emption laws. Official surveys were to be made, and the same section which gives…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Daniels v. LansdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by20 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Walter v. Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Whitney v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.