Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Patterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

•Appeal from Presque Me. (Emerick, J.) Bill for specific performance of contract. Complainant-appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The bill in this case is filed to obtain specific performance of a contract made between defend*142ant ¿James B. Patterson and Frederick D. Larke, dated September 25, 1882. Tbe contract was made in tbe name of Augusta Larke, on the part of Mr. Larke, and was .subsequently assigned by her to complainant, as requested by her husband. Prior to the making of this contract, James B. Patterson made a contract with the State for the construction of a State road; said contract being known as “ Contract No. 23 Ocqueoc Branch of the Duncan City and Alpena State Boad.” He located and reserved, to be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bartle v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Richardson v. . CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Thomas v. CaulkettMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Patton v. NicholsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  5. Weber v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meyers v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Mahoney v. Lincoln Brick Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Polk v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API