Southern Railway Co. v. Standard Growers Exchange
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
These suits for damages on account of injuries to shipments of freight were based on the contracts of affreightment, which did not in any way change the legal rule of liability. It was alleged that the peaches were received by the carrier in good, sound condition, and that when delivered by it they were damaged by decay. The only questions dealt with in the briefs of counsel were whether the court erred in refusing to dismiss the petitions on general demurrer because they failed to allege negligence on the part of the defendants, either in general terms or by setting forth any such particular…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Fish v. Chapman & RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Warfield & LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Forrester v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Cromer v. DinklerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- A. A. A. Highway Express Inc. v. Bone & HendrixCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Viney v. Aero-Mayflower Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FugazziCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.